Skip navigation
Go to Home Go to FAQGo to GlossaryGo to Help
FAME Home
Go to Rights and ResponsibilitiesGo to Universal Design for LearningGo to Web Accessability and Assistive TechnologyGo to College WritingCurrently on Climate Assessment

Gathering Existing Data


Climate Assessment > Planning the Climate Assessment Process: Preassessment > Gathering Existing Data
Turn Navigation Menu OffGo Back to the previous pageGo to next page

As previously mentioned, most postsecondary education programs already collect a wide range of institutional data, such as characteristics of program attendees, student retention rates, and course completion data. Institution-wide offices such as admissions, registrar, financial aid, research and planning, and other units probably keep and store such data as records in hard-copy archives or electronic databases. This kind of data usually provides a demographic description of clientele, which services and supports are accessed by whom, and the needs of different student subgroups to be successful in various programs. Often departments, schools, and colleges collect extensive data on students applying to, persisting in, and matriculating from, their programs. All of this type of information is usually available to administrators and faculty and can be very helpful in thinking about where to begin the climate assessment process.

Suggestions for Collecting Existing Data:

It should be noted that data-gathering from existing sources can play a vital role in assessing student retention. Retention is another important reason for conducting a climate assessment: to learn not only what has attracted students to an academic program, department, or the college itself, but also how to keep them there after they have begun their studies. Retention is critical because it can lead to better academic and employment outcomes for the student and serve as a significant benchmark of educational quality for the institution. Because students with disabilities as a group do not graduate from college at the same rate as their peers without disabilities (U.S. Department of Education, NCES, 1999), it is particularly important to monitor group retention rates and to identify possible contributing factors, such as a lack of accommodations and supports. See Unit 4 for more information on retention.

Go Back to the previous pageGo to TopGo to next page